Quarterdeck DESQview

» see quarterdeck.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the obit ~

desqview shipped in july 1985, four months ahead of windows 1.0, and for the next eight years it was the answer for anyone who wanted to run two dos programs at the same time without rebooting. it was a text-mode multitasker with resizable overlapping windows on a character grid, which sounds like a contradiction until you remember that the whole pc world ran in text mode at that point and the alternative was alt-tabbing in your head between floppies.

desqview 386 was the version that mattered. quarterdeck paired the multitasker with their qemm memory manager and shipped the combination as a single product, which is how you got bbs sysops running four nodes of a fidonet board on one 386 machine with a single phone line per com port. byte called it the most ambitious multitasking environment on the platform. people who actually shipped it called it the only one that worked.

i missed desqview by exactly one generation. by the time i got my first home computer in 1998 with a 33.6k modem on ttnet, windows 95 was the default everywhere in turkey and the dos multitasker category had already been gone for three years. the desqview install base in 1998 was bbs sysops winding down and people running niche legacy software they could not move off. quarterdeck got bought by symantec in october of that year. desqview did not get a successor.

~ the rap sheet ~

~ what it actually did ~

desqview let you carve the screen into windowed panes and run a different dos program in each one. you could have lotus 1-2-3 open in one window while a telecom program in another pane pulled email off a bbs at 2400 baud. it preempted between them on a 286 cooperatively and on a 386 with full virtual-86 mode, which meant each program thought it had the whole machine.

the trick was that desqview was tiny. it ran in a fraction of conventional memory and the qemm memory manager that came with desqview 386 worked harder than ms-dos's own emm386 ever did. you could squeeze a lot more usable ram out of the same chip with qemm than without it. that is why qemm outlived desqview itself and stayed in the lineup until the same 1998 acquisition.

~ the bbs years ~

the cultural footprint of desqview lived almost entirely in the bbs world. multi-node boards needed a way to run several copies of a bbs program on one machine, each one watching its own modem on its own com port. desqview was how you did that affordably without buying multiple computers. fidonet and rime nodes ran on it for years, and wildcat documented the desqview configuration in its own setup guides as if it were a hardware requirement. every sysop knew the dv hotkey sequence by hand.

this is where desqview stopped being software and became infrastructure. the people running it were not casual users dabbling in shareware. they were the small operators keeping the pre-web online world running at the wire level, and they renewed desqview licenses long after retail had moved on to windows.

~ what really happened ~

quarterdeck spent the mid-nineties trying to pivot to internet utilities. they bought datastorm (procomm plus), they shipped cleansweep, they had a browser-cache cleaner before that was a category. none of it had the same install base as the dos products and the company never found a second hit. symantec closed the acquisition in october 1998 and absorbed the brand. cleansweep got rebranded as a norton product, qemm 97 was the final iteration of the memory manager, and desqview itself got no further development.

the 1998 acquisition is the cleanly-dead moment. the brand was gone and the team had been absorbed into symantec's utilities division. dos multitasking as a paying market did not exist anymore by then. windows 95 had been out for three years and windows 98 had shipped four months earlier. anyone still running desqview in production was doing it because they could not afford to migrate, not because they were choosing it on merits.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »