Inbox by Gmail

» see inbox.google.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the eulogy ~

inbox by gmail was announced on october 22, 2014. for the first six months it was invitation-only, the kind of soft launch where you waited for a friend at google to send you a code. the public release came on may 28, 2015. the product was a separate app and web client built by the gmail team but treated as an experiment, free to break the conventions that gmail itself could not. instead of a flat list of messages it gave you bundles, where related emails were collapsed into a single line you could expand. snooze made a message disappear until next thursday morning. smart reply offered short replies the model thought you might want to send with a tap.

the people who used it tended to use it hard. the bundles handled the noise that gmail had given up on, with promotional and social emails stacked into their own rows that you could deal with in batches. snooze meant you stopped using your inbox as a to-do list at the cost of getting the message back later. smart reply landed often enough that by march 2016 google said about ten percent of mobile email replies were going through it. the product had a small but devoted base who treated it as the actual gmail and treated regular gmail as the legacy version.

i used inbox from around 2016 until the shutdown. android phone with ttnet broadband at home, bundles turned on for promos so they did not show up in the main view. the snooze button became muscle memory. when google announced the shutdown i was annoyed in the way you are annoyed when a tool you actually liked gets discontinued because the company decided it was redundant. i moved back to gmail proper and turned on the bundles-equivalent priority inbox tabs, approximating what i had been doing in inbox with about seventy percent fidelity.

~ the dossier ~

~ the curtain ~

google announced the shutdown on september 12, 2018, with about seven months of notice. the official reason was that inbox had been an experimental playground for new ideas, and now those ideas had matured enough to live inside gmail itself. snooze was added to gmail. smart reply moved over alongside nudges and hover actions. the company's framing was that inbox had succeeded in its job, which was to test features, and the consolidated gmail was the better product going forward.

the framing was true on the feature side but missed the structural difference. inbox bundled messages by default. gmail did not. inbox snoozed at message level with no friction. gmail's snooze sits one menu deeper. the difference was the defaults and the feel of the interface, not just the feature checklist. a lot of inbox users said this loudly on the blog post comments and on twitter, and a small group built an extension called inbox reborn that tried to recreate the visual style on top of gmail. the extension was a workaround, not a replacement.

the actual shutdown happened on april 2, 2019. inbox.google.com started redirecting to mail.google.com. the android and ios apps stopped working on devices that still had them installed. there was no migration tool to bring your custom bundles or your snooze defaults across, since the underlying data lived in gmail anyway. on the morning of april 2, your bundles were gone, your snooze list had been re-rendered as starred messages, and the redesigned inbox view was just gmail.

~ what it left ~

the parts of inbox that survived. snooze, smart reply, smart compose, nudges, the linked-card view for travel and packages, all of these are now in gmail. the experiment did its job in that sense. gmail is more useful for having had inbox as an upstream r&d branch for almost five years. most people using gmail today have inbox features running underneath without knowing where they came from.

the parts that did not survive. the bundles-by-default interface. the calm of opening the app and seeing six rows where there used to be a hundred. the willingness to redesign email rather than add features to it. inbox was the rare google product that let itself look different from the parent, and when it folded back in, the visual confidence went with it. gmail is more capable than it was in 2014 and visually about the same, which is the trade google made.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »