YouOS

» see youos.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the obit ~

YouOS loaded a desktop into your browser. Not a page that looked like a desktop, an actual windowing environment with overlapping windows you could drag and resize, running real applications. Your files and your session lived on a server, so the same desktop came back on any machine you signed in from. This was 2006. Firefox 1.5 was current, Internet Explorer 6 was still the majority browser, and the whole thing was JavaScript talking to a remote server on a connection that in most of the world was measured in hundreds of kilobits.

The company was Webshaka, four founders in Palo Alto with a small Y Combinator check behind them. The word they used was operating system, which was a stretch and drew the obvious objection, but the underlying claim was defensible: they had a process model and a place for programs to run. What made it more than a demo was the API. Users wrote applications for it, over seven hundred of them, using an editor that was itself a window inside the desktop. You could write a YouOS app inside YouOS and hand someone a link to it.

PC World put it seventh on its twenty most innovative products of 2006, which is the peak of the story and arrives about nine months into it. The software never left alpha. It never had to, because the point was always the demonstration rather than the product.

I would have been the audience for this. In 2006 I was mid-degree in computer engineering with TTNet broadband at home and a serious interest in what browsers could be pushed into doing, and a windowed desktop built out of JavaScript is exactly the kind of thing that circulated as a link with no explanation attached. Whether I ever kept an account there I honestly cannot tell you, and I am not going to invent one. What I remember of the category is the argument it started, which was whether the browser was a document reader that had grown some features or a runtime that had not admitted it yet.

~ the rap sheet ~

~ the rise ~

The webtop idea was briefly a whole category. YouOS, eyeOS, Desktoptwo, Xindows, Glide and a dozen others were all shipping some version of the same demo between 2005 and 2008, and the trade press treated the question of whether the desktop would move into the browser as genuinely open. The pitch made sense on paper. Your session follows you and the machine in front of you stops mattering.

What none of them had was a reason to be there for more than ten minutes. A desktop is a container. Its value comes from the programs inside it, and the programs people actually wanted were already on the web without needing a fake desktop wrapped around them. Gmail did not want to be a window in your browser-based window manager. It wanted the whole tab.

~ the funny part ~

The shutdown notice is the best thing about YouOS, because one of the founders posted it himself on Hacker News and did not dress it up. They had not worked on it since November 2006. Why it failed was going to be a longer post one day, and it came down to never finding a use for it themselves. That is a rarer sentence than it should be. Most dead software gets a farewell page about an incredible journey.

The founders had all moved on to things that worked better. One went to 23andMe, and two of them sold a wedding-vendor startup to eHarmony. Palo Alto in 2008 was not a hard place to land after an abandoned side project.

~ the inheritance ~

Everything YouOS was trying to prove is now boring. Figma runs a design tool with a compiled rendering engine in a tab, and Windows itself will stream you a whole desktop over the same pipe. The technical claim was correct and arrived roughly a decade early, before the JavaScript engines or the bandwidth existed to make it feel like anything other than a stunt.

What did not survive is the framing. Nobody wants a metaphorical desktop in a browser, because the browser turned out to be the desktop, and the applications sit in tabs rather than in windows drawn by a web page pretending to be an operating system. YouOS was right about where the software would run and wrong about what it would look like when it got there.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »