Yahoo Voices

» see voices.yahoo.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the last words ~

yahoo voices was the kind of result you used to see on the second page of a google search around 2012. you would search for some specific question, get a yahoo voices article that read like four hundred words of restated wikipedia, scroll past it, keep looking. the platform itself was invisible as a brand. the urls it produced were everywhere.

luke beatty started associated content in january 2005 as one of the first content-farm businesses on the open web. anyone could write articles for the platform and get paid up front or by page view. yahoo bought it for about one hundred million dollars in may 2010 and rebranded the property as yahoo voices later that year. at the rebrand they claimed over two million pieces of content from more than five hundred thousand contributors. the model was to find a trending search query, pay a contributor a few dollars to produce a four-hundred-word piece on it, push it through yahoo's domain authority, and ride the traffic for a year or two.

google rolled out the panda algorithm update in february 2011 with the explicit goal of demoting low-quality content sites. demand media's stock dropped sharply, and associated content / yahoo voices lost most of its organic traffic. the business model that funded the contributor payouts stopped funding them. yahoo never figured out a second act for the platform, and after three years of decline they announced the shutdown on july 2 2014. all content came down on july 31. five hundred thousand contributors lost their archives overnight.

~ the record ~

~ the content farm model ~

the late-2000s seo gold rush ran on this exact pattern. someone would find a keyword with high search volume but low quality competition, pay a contributor a few dollars to write something passable, push it through the platform's domain authority, and ride the traffic. demand media and associated content were the two largest practitioners. the writing was famously bad. ehow articles claiming you could clean rust with toothpaste, yahoo voices pieces explaining things in confident detail that the author had clearly looked up five minutes before writing, the genre had a flavor you could spot within a sentence. as an engineer doing technical searches in 2011 i learned to recognize the yahoo voices result and skip it.

~ the panda update ~

google's panda algorithm went after the entire content-farm category in february 2011. the update specifically targeted sites that scored low on user-quality signals like time-on-page and bounce rate, which content farms produced almost by definition. yahoo voices was one of the named casualties in seo analyses of that quarter. traffic collapsed and the cost-per-pageview economics that paid contributors evaporated. the platform limped on for three more years on declining revenue.

~ the delete ~

the shutdown deleted everything. yahoo gave contributors a few weeks to download what they could and then took the entire archive offline. for hobbyist writers who had used yahoo voices as a portfolio or a side income stream, the platform's death was a small mass-erasure event. the wayback machine eventually caught some of the content, but most yahoo voices urls now resolve to nothing. it is one of the cleaner examples of what happens when a company that owns your archive decides the archive is no longer worth hosting.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »