Facebook Lite (2009)

» see facebook.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the obituary ~

Facebook Lite's rollout list in 2009 ran to three countries and Turkey was not one of them. The product was built for people whose connections dropped and whose computers were old, and it launched in North America plus India. By then I was on TTNet broadband in Ankara and doing fine. A large part of the country was not, and Facebook was already enormous here. A low bandwidth Facebook would have made obvious sense in Turkey. It never showed up.

The announcement came in August 2009 and the first version went to invited testers, with screenshots leaking out around 12 August. What they got was the same site with most of it taken away: no third party applications, and far less to pull down on every page load. The BBC wrote it up on 11 September 2009 when the wider rollout started. Most of the coverage read it as an answer to Twitter, a faster and thinner feed for people who wanted the updates without everything built around them.

On 20 April 2010 Facebook posted on the product's own fan page that Lite was finished and that everyone using it would be sent back to the full site. Eight months from announcement to redirect. No usage numbers were ever published, and the coverage that ran the next morning was mostly a paragraph long. The working theory then, and nobody has improved on it since, is that maintaining a second web front end alongside the main site and the mobile site cost more than the traffic it carried was worth.

~ the case file ~

~ how it landed ~

The reasoning was sound on paper. Facebook's main page in 2009 was getting heavier every quarter, and the growth was arriving from exactly the places with the worst bandwidth. Lite was the company admitting that gap out loud. Putting India in the launch group was the honest half of the decision.

Putting the United States and Canada in it was the confusing half. Neither market needed a low bandwidth Facebook in 2009. It meant most of the people who ever saw Lite had no reason to keep using it, while the people with a reason were sitting in countries the rollout never reached. A product aimed at slow connections spent its whole life in front of fast ones.

~ what it became ~

In June 2015 Facebook shipped an Android app called Facebook Lite, under one megabyte, aimed at cheap phones and slow networks. Same name, completely different thing: a native app rather than a stripped web page, and a rollout that went where the 2009 version had not. That one worked. It is still running in 2026 and is one of the largest Facebook clients in the world by install count.

So the 2009 web version is a dead product whose name got recycled onto a live one, which makes it nearly impossible to look up. Type the words into any search engine today and you get an app store listing, not the eight months. The idea survived. The thing that had the idea first did not.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »