Examiner.com

» see examiner.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the obituary ~

examiner.com sat in the part of the english-speaking internet i could read about but had no reason to use. it was a US local news network. each of the two hundred thirty eight covered cities had its own set of "examiners", freelancers paid per page view to write hyperlocal pieces on whatever topic they had pitched themselves into. the network spanned major cities and small midwestern towns nobody outside their home state could find on a map. none of those cities was ankara, the audience was entirely inside the united states.

the company was a clarity digital media operation, owned by philip anschutz, the same billionaire who owned the los angeles kings and the staples center under anschutz entertainment group. it launched in april 2008 and grew fast. by mid '09 it claimed forty four thousand examiners across one hundred sixty markets. by july 2010 it hit twenty million unique visitors a month, which was real numbers for a service that was effectively a per-click content sweatshop. the business model was simple. you wrote about a local restaurant or a high school football game. the cms slapped ads next to it. google sent traffic from search queries. you got a fraction of a penny per page view.

the model broke on february 23 2011. google rolled out the panda algorithm update that morning, the first time the search engine explicitly downgraded low-quality content sites. examiner.com lost seventy nine percent of its search traffic in the first week. the freelancers' per-view earnings collapsed, the bulk of the network walked away within a year. the brand kept running on smaller and smaller traffic for five more years until anschutz pulled the plug on july 10 2016.

~ the case file ~

~ the panda day ~

the february 2011 panda update is its own line in the history of the web. before panda, the cheapest way to make money on the open internet was to flood it with thin content that ranked on long-tail keywords. content farms paid pennies per piece, hired thousands of writers, drowned google's results in low-effort listicles and explainers. the update changed that overnight. examiner was not the biggest hit but it was the cleanest case study, partly because the percentage drop was extreme and partly because the brand had a recognizable name above the fold.

~ the long fade ~

between '11 and '16 the network shrank quietly. headcount fell. coverage of small cities went first. by '15 most "examiners" were sole proprietors writing for ad share that no longer paid them enough to bother. the editorial standards, never high, collapsed into whatever a writer was willing to publish for a fraction of nothing. honestly, by the final year the front page was dominated by spam and recycled posts. on july 10 2016 the parent group shut the site down, citing "the conditions of the media landscape." about four years of older articles were eventually archived to a static mirror, much of the rest disappeared with the cms.

~ the inheritance ~

examiner is the canonical panda casualty in the content-farm graveyard, alongside ehow's parent demand media and the suite101 long tail. the bigger story is that the per-click-content-factory model never came back at scale. ad networks rewrote rate cards and programmatic display prices collapsed. social platforms swallowed the audience. by 2026 the only places that pay per page view on local news are a handful of patch-style networks running on much smaller crews. anschutz still owns the la kings. the examiner.com domain redirects to a portfolio page nobody updates.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »