Digital Compact Cassette

~ the last words ~

It played your old tapes. That was the pitch, and Philips built the whole format around it. A Digital Compact Cassette deck would accept an ordinary analog cassette, the one from your car or off the shelf, and play it back through the same transport that read the digital format. Sony's competing disc could not do that and never pretended otherwise. Philips spent four years finding out that nobody had been asking.

The format was announced on 8 October 1990, developed with Matsushita, and shown running at the summer CES in Chicago in May 1992 before it reached shops later that year. The first machine was the DCC-900, a component deck for a hi-fi rack, with portables following as the DCC-130 and the recording DCC-170. Grundig and Marantz built models of their own. Inside, the tape ran past a thin-film head reading nine tracks at once, with the audio squeezed by a scheme Philips called PASC to fit the data rate a cassette shell could carry.

MiniDisc launched the same year and split whatever appetite existed for replacing the cassette. Neither format got near it. Analog cassettes were still selling at something like two and a half billion tapes a year worldwide, on players that cost almost nothing, and both challengers arrived at prices that ruled out the people who bought the most music. Philips quietly stopped mass production in October 1996, and a spokeswoman put it about as gently as it can be put: they were still delivering the product, they just were not making much of it anymore.

Turkey in 1992 was a cassette country in the most literal way available. Tapes came off street stalls and out of shop windows, dubbed and re-dubbed, and the car deck was where most people heard most of their music. A digital tape at a European hi-fi price answers a question that market was not asking. The format had already been discontinued by the time i first went online in 1998, and the successor that actually arrived was not a tape at all. It was a file with no carrier under it.

~ the record ~

~ what backward compatibility bought ~

The one feature everything was built around turned out to be worth less than it sounded. A DCC machine would play your analog tapes but could not record onto them, so the old deck stayed in the rack anyway. The head assembly that made the playback possible added cost to every unit sold. And the mechanism was still a tape transport, which meant that reaching track seven took as long as it had always taken to wind to track seven.

Sony had made the opposite trade and got the better end of it. The MiniDisc broke with everything that came before, and in exchange it found any track instantly and fit in a coat pocket. Philips was selling continuity to people who were a few years away from not caring about continuity at all.

~ what won instead ~

Neither of them killed the cassette. What did was a compressed audio file, and the argument that had been used against both formats stopped applying the moment it arrived. Audiophiles rejected PASC and Sony's ATRAC on the grounds that lossy compression damaged the recording. Within five years the same listeners were carrying libraries encoded at 128 kbps and were pleased about it, because the thing being traded away was no longer measured against a better tape. It was measured against carrying nothing.

MiniDisc survived long enough to matter, mostly in Japan, with the last players built in 2013. DCC got four years on sale and no second act. Philips had engineered a bridge between two things very carefully, and the far side of the bridge turned out to be somewhere nobody was going.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »