CGSociety

» see cgsociety.org as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the eulogy ~

CGTalk opened on 9 December 2001 as the official forum of a business Leonard Teo was working for. The business collapsed about six months later without paying him, and he came away holding the forum instead of wages. That is a better origin story than most companies get, and it explains the thing's whole character: an independent board in a trade whose other large forums mostly belonged to software vendors.

By April 2005 the surrounding properties, CGNetworks and the workshops, had been folded into one name at cgsociety.org, run out of Adelaide by Teo and Mark Snoswell under Ballistic Media. The site carried galleries and a front page of industry news, with paid workshops taught by working artists, and underneath all of it the forum, which was the reason anyone came.

What CGTalk did better than anything since was the work-in-progress thread. You posted a render that was not finished, with the parts you knew were wrong, and strangers who did this for a living told you about your topology or your light falloff. The social contract ran toward showing the mess.

~ the dossier ~

~ the challenges ~

The CG Challenges were the site's own invention and its best years. Ballistic would set a theme, Machine Flesh and Grand Space Opera being the ones people still name, and thousands of artists would work a single image or animation for weeks in public threads where every revision was visible. The results were printed as hardback books by Ballistic Publishing, which meant an unknown artist in any country could end up in a volume that art directors actually bought.

That was a genuine career ladder for people with no film-school credential and no connection to Los Angeles or London. For a stretch of the 2000s it worked as well as any formal pipeline in the industry.

I came up on the other side of the same mathematics. Computer vision takes an image and tries to recover the world; rendering takes a world and makes an image, and the two fields read each other's papers while sharing almost no professional culture. I never posted a render for critique. I have spent twenty years finding answers in threads exactly like those, written by people solving something specific at two in the morning.

~ the long decline ~

The decline is reported consistently by the people who were still there. A forum redesign broke the habits the old one had trained, and moderation thinned out behind it. Advertisements for software releases sat on the front page for years after the release. Meanwhile the work-in-progress thread migrated to ArtStation and to Instagram, where the finished image is the unit.

~ what went with it ~

The email went to members in December 2023 and gave them until 8 January 2024 to download their own images and conversations. Artists in the community asked to take a copy of the database or to run the forum themselves, and by every account on the boards that followed, neither was permitted. The capture calendar agrees on the date: the last normal page in the archive is from 8 January 2024 and the first redirect is four days later.

Twenty-two years of threads went with it, which in a technical trade means twenty-two years of worked solutions to problems that recur. Somebody in 2006 explained how to fix a specific artifact in a specific renderer, and that explanation was load-bearing for a surprising number of people until the morning it was not there.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »