Beme

» see beme.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the last words ~

by 2015 i was a 31-year-old engineer in ankara. casey neistat's youtube channel had a fan demographic that skewed considerably younger than that, and beme's pitch was an even narrower slice of that fan base. it was not designed for me and i was not the audience. i registered the existence of beme through the same techcrunch posts everyone else read it through and never opened the app.

casey neistat had been a popular new york filmmaker since the early 2010s, but the daily-vlog era of his youtube channel that began in march 2015 was what turned him into one of the platform's first big-channel stars. the same year his cofounder matt hackett, formerly head of engineering at tumblr, shipped beme on the ios app store. the gimmick was strict. you held your phone up to your chest. the proximity sensor blocked the screen so you could not see what you were filming. the app recorded a four-second clip and uploaded it to your followers immediately, with no preview window and no quick-redo loop. the idea was unfiltered video that resisted the vanity-edit instinct instagram and snapchat were already encouraging.

that strict ux had a problem. people like seeing what they are about to share. they like deleting the bad takes. beme blocked both. the app launched in july 2015 to a curiosity wave from the casey neistat audience and got about a million downloads in the first week, then the daily-active numbers slid hard once the gimmick wore off. the team shipped a redesigned version in mid-2016 that loosened the restrictions, but it was already late.

on november 28, 2016 cnn announced it had acquired beme for a reported $25 million. cnn's stated plan was to use the team to build a new youth-oriented news brand that would still be called beme. the day after the announcement matt hackett emailed beme app users that the original app would shut down on january 31, 2017, which is exactly what happened. casey neistat moved into cnn digital studios for a year. in january 2018 he announced he was leaving and beme would be folded into cnn digital studios proper. the app was never coming back.

~ the record ~

~ how it landed ~

beme arrived inside the casey neistat youtube boom. in mid-2015 casey was uploading a daily vlog that was getting millions of views, and beme was the side project where his ux experiment lived. the launch generated huge press coverage, partly because beme was an app idea that came with a built-in distribution channel via casey's millions of subscribers. that pattern of creator-led app with a founder's audience pre-seeded was a new thing in 2015. it explained why beme could ship to a million downloads in a week without ad spend. it also explained why the engagement curve fell so fast. the audience was casey's audience, not beme's audience. the two were not the same.

~ the cnn buy ~

cnn's november 2016 acquisition of beme for a reported $25 million was widely seen as confusing at the time. the app's daily user numbers were already in decline and the gimmick was not catching on, so the strategic value of the deal was hard to read from outside. cnn's framing was that they were buying the team and the brand for a new youth-news vertical. for about a year the team kept working at cnn under the beme name and casey neistat appeared in a handful of cnn segments. the strategy quietly drifted past that. casey announced in january 2018 he was leaving, and the beme brand was folded into cnn digital studios after that. the second beme effectively died inside cnn the same way the first beme had died as an app, just with more institutional cushioning.

~ the legacy ~

beme's actual contribution to product history is small but specific. the unfiltered-video idea did not stick in 2015, but bereal picked it up in 2020 with a different framing of a daily two-minute window and made the same impulse work at scale. the lesson buried in beme is that the unfiltered-share concept needed friction other than 'you can't see what you are recording.' bereal solved it with timing pressure rather than visual restriction. that is one of those design adjustments that looks obvious in hindsight, and beme paid the bill for figuring out it was needed.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »