Stickam

» see stickam.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the eulogy ~

Stickam launched in February 2005 as a division of Advanced Video Communications, a Los Angeles company that had been doing corporate video-conferencing software since 2004. The product was a Flash-based live video player that you could embed on any other website. You logged into Stickam and opened your webcam through the browser, and the stream went out to anyone with the embed code. The chat box sat next to the player. People could hop into your room and type in a sidebar that you could read on a second monitor. This was 2005, five months after Skype video had launched and two years before Justin Kan started lifecasting. Stickam was the first place where being on a webcam in front of strangers became a regular afternoon activity for a lot of teenagers.

By March 2012 the platform had 9.3 million registered users. The audience skewed teenage. Musicians used Stickam for early acoustic sessions, and CBS Radio ran a partnership for a stretch in 2009. The service made money on display ads and on premium accounts that gave broadcasters more bandwidth and longer recording. The cultural footprint was always larger than the revenue. For a few years in the late 2000s, if you wanted to broadcast yourself to the internet without setting up a Justin.tv-class operation, Stickam was where you went.

The end came on January 30 2013 when AVC posted a notice that Stickam would be shutting down the next day. There was no transition period. There was no acquirer. The site went dark on January 31 2013. AVC kept its other businesses going, but Stickam was simply removed from the internet overnight. The reason was never publicly stated. The unspoken context was that webcam streaming had moved on to platforms like Justin.tv, the predecessor of Twitch, which had cleaner moderation and a more legitimate cultural position.

i never logged in. i was already in my early twenties when stickam launched and the platform skewed teenage. webcam culture in turkey at the time meant msn webcam chat with people you actually knew, not broadcasting to strangers in a sidebar. i learned about stickam years later from listverse-tier retro internet writing and a few "dead websites you forgot about" video essays on youtube. by the time i looked it up the shutdown was already five years in the past.

~ the dossier ~

~ the embed-anywhere model ~

Stickam's actual technical product was the embeddable player. Once you had a Stickam room, you could drop a small chunk of HTML onto any other webpage and your live stream would play there. People used this to put their stream on their MySpace profile or on personal blogs. The viewer never had to leave the host page. This was a real innovation in 2005 because YouTube had only just launched and the assumption was still that video lived on dedicated video sites. Stickam treated live video as a thing you could decorate the rest of your internet with, and a generation of MySpace pages made use of that.

The embed model also made the rooms feel like personal spaces. Your stream lived inside your blog or your MySpace profile, not on a dedicated video site. The viewer arrived in your context. Twitch eventually built a much larger version of the same idea but with the host site flipped, where Twitch became the center of gravity rather than the embedded widget on someone else's page.

~ the safety problem that did not go away ~

Stickam's defining controversy was that a meaningful fraction of its users were minors broadcasting unsupervised from their own bedrooms. Press coverage and child-safety advocates flagged this from at least 2007 onward. There were reports of older users grooming younger users in private chat, and the company's age-verification was effectively non-existent. A 2010 Forbes article described the platform's relationship with predator concerns as a structural feature of how the product worked rather than a bug it could fix.

The Jessi Slaughter incident in July 2010 made the issue national news. An eleven-year-old girl posted videos to Stickam that drew an enormous wave of harassment from 4chan, including death threats and the now-famous video of her father shouting at the camera. After that, Stickam introduced a "zero tolerance" policy on nudity and bullying. A former AVC vice president told reporters that the company had never put adequate protections in place for the teenage user base it had built its growth around. The policy change in 2010 did not really fix anything that mattered.

~ what came after ~

By 2013 the livestreaming category had moved on. Justin.tv had pivoted into Twitch in June 2011 and was taking over the gaming-broadcast market. YouNow launched in 2011 and absorbed the teen-personal-broadcast audience that Stickam had been the pioneer for. Periscope and Meerkat would arrive in early 2015 with the mobile-livestream model. Stickam, with its Flash player and its desktop-era assumptions, did not have a clear answer to any of this. The shutdown when it came was less a death than an admission that the rest of the internet had already routed around the site.

What Stickam did predict, beyond the obvious technical lineage to Twitch and YouNow, was the parasocial bedroom-broadcast aesthetic of TikTok and Instagram Live. The lonely-teenager-on-camera with the chat box scrolling alongside the human face: that whole format was first normalized on Stickam between 2006 and 2010. The platforms that followed cleaned it up and monetized it. Stickam was where the format was figured out, in conditions that were never quite under control.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »