Pheed

» see pheed.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the last words ~

american celebrity-tier branding used pheed. that was not a category i tracked. paid social was a hard sell anywhere in 2012 to 2014, in turkey it never had a real chance. people here had a hierarchy of free things to be on: facebook, twitter, instagram, swarm. honestly the idea of typing in a credit card to follow somebody's feed read as a category error.

the pheed pitch was structurally about creators owning the layer. you could paywall an individual post or run a paid live stream. each post got a built-in copyright mark called a pheed. likes had a paired downvote that the company called "i don't love this" so the engagement loop was rougher than a normal heart. for some reason this scaffolding showed up in november 2012 with a press cycle and a list of celebrity early adopters that included miley cyrus and paris hilton.

i was not paying attention to it. by november 2012 i was busy with edge compute work and the daily timeline noise had migrated almost entirely to twitter and the early years of instagram. pheed showed up in a few american tech blogs i would skim and never showed up anywhere in my own feed.

~ the record ~

~ the early days ~

eight million registered users sounds like a lot for a year-old app. it was. the press coverage was strong, the launch was warm, the celebrities posted enough times to keep the marketing line plausible. the rough split was teen and young-adult fans of the celebrity early adopters, then a thin layer of musicians and artists testing the paywall mechanic on smaller drops.

the company was not really a pure social network. it was a publishing tool for creators with monetization built in. that put it in a strange middle position between a fan club, a tip jar, and a media app. patreon had launched in may 2013 with a cleaner version of the same idea, focused on recurring subscriptions rather than per-post fees. that competition mattered.

~ the fall ~

a paywall on individual posts is hard to defend on a social platform whose graph is small. eight million registered users sounds large in raw count but the share of those who would type a credit card to read a celebrity post was much smaller. retention was the bigger problem; the engagement loop without a free version had no way to keep a casual visitor coming back daily.

the company also tried to be many things at once: text, image, audio, video, live stream, paywall. the surface area was too wide for a startup of its size to defend, and the celebrity attention faded after the first wave of launch posts.

~ what really happened ~

mobli, the carlos slim-backed photo-and-video app, acquired pheed in march 2014 for about forty million in cash and stock. mobli itself was an america movil portfolio asset and shared the slim family's broader latin-america media bet. the deal absorbed pheed's tech into the parent's stack and the consumer app slowly went dark by april 2016. nothing kept the brand alive on the other side. the entire celebrity early-adopter list moved on to whatever was happening on snapchat and then instagram stories.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »