PepperTap

» see peppertap.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the obit ~

PepperTap shut down with money still in the bank. That is the unusual part and it is the reason this page exists. Companies of this kind normally die at the bottom of the account, after the bridge round and the month where payroll does not clear, and the founders keep going long past the point of sense because stopping is an admission. PepperTap did the arithmetic on the cost of one delivery, decided that number was never going to come down far enough, and closed the consumer business while it could still choose what to do next.

It was founded in Gurgaon by Navneet Singh and Milind Sharma, and took its first orders on 26 November 2014. Ten of them. The model was hyperlocal and carried no inventory at all: PepperTap put the shelves of grocery shops that already existed into an app, then sent someone on a motorbike to collect the order and deliver it inside two hours. By October 2015 it was in seventeen cities and moving around twenty thousand orders a day, which made it the third largest online grocer in the country.

The money followed the graph. A $36m round in September 2015 led by SAIF Partners sat on top of earlier checks from Sequoia, and the total across four rounds came to roughly fifty million dollars, with Snapdeal and JAFCO on the register too. Then in February 2016 the company pulled out of six cities in a single announcement and kept eight. Singh's line at the time was that the investment climate had made depth more sensible than breadth. Ten weeks later there was no depth either.

Grocery delivery never had to be invented in Turkey, which is why this whole category reads strangely from here. The corner shop took a phone call and sent someone up with the bag, and it was doing that before anybody in the neighborhood had a modem, and it charged nothing extra because the shop was forty meters away and the person carrying the bag was already being paid. What the Indian startups were funding was that same arrangement rebuilt in software with a stranger's motorbike inserted in the middle of it, at a cost per order the shop never had to carry. The app was better at finding you. It was much worse at the part where somebody walks.

~ the rap sheet ~

~ the money that was left ~

The pivot went to Nuvo Ex, a logistics business Singh had started before PepperTap, handling supply chains for large Indian online retailers. His account of it was straightforward: they had tested some ideas there earlier in the year, liked the results enough to take them back to the existing investors, and proposed spending the remaining capital on that instead of on groceries. The investors agreed, which they had no obligation to do.

About 400 delivery staff went. Of roughly 200 office employees, 150 went and 50 moved across to the logistics business. Nobody involved has ever described this as anything other than a failure, and it was one. It was also handled about as well as a failure of this size can be, which is worth saying because the comparable Indian shutdowns from the same eighteen months mostly were not.

~ what the discount bought ~

The company published its own reasons and two of the three turn out to be the same reason. The first was integration: it had onboarded partner stores faster than it could connect to them, so the app's idea of what was in stock and the shop's idea of what was in stock kept diverging. The other two were money spent to make the graph go up, heavy discounting to bring customers in and spare delivery capacity built in every city so that demand spikes did not break the two-hour promise.

The discount and the buffer are both purchases of a growth number. A customer arriving because a basket costs thirty percent less is a customer who leaves the week the discount stops, and delivery capacity sitting idle so that Saturday works is a cost carried seven days for one. Both were rational while the funding market rewarded order volume, and both became indefensible in early 2016 when it stopped. The Indian consumer internet spent 2015 buying users at a price no one had checked against the value of a user.

~ where it went ~

2016 emptied out the category. Ola closed Ola Store in March and Grofers withdrew from most of its smaller cities the same year, having watched the same numbers PepperTap had. The survivors were the ones with either a warehouse of their own or a shareholder deep enough to keep paying, and PepperTap had neither, which the founders could see a year before most of their peers admitted the same thing about themselves.

The category itself was right, which is the part that stings. Grofers survived long enough to become Blinkit and sell to Zomato in 2022, and the ten-minute grocery delivery that is now ordinary in Indian cities is the same business PepperTap was running, at a scale and a capital base it never had access to. Being early and being wrong look identical from inside. peppertap.com resolves today to an unrelated wellness blog that has taken the name, which is the standard afterlife for a dead consumer brand with a memorable domain.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »