Maven Networks

» see maven.net as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the last words ~

maven was b2b plumbing. if you watched a fox news clip embedded on foxnews.com in 2007, or a cbs sports highlight, or a sony bmg artist promo, the video player around the stream was a maven networks build, white-labeled with the publisher's branding. the maven brand never appeared anywhere a consumer would see. that is the cleanest single sentence about why maven is hard to remember now. the player was everywhere, the company was nowhere.

maven was founded in 2002 at 4 cambridge center in cambridge massachusetts. the pitch to media companies was that you would not have to build your own video player, ad insertion stack and content management for video assets. maven would host the platform, provide a customisable player skin, handle the back-end of ad-network integration. fox news signed up early, then sony bmg, cbs sports, the new york times, hgtv, sundance channel. by 2007 there were around thirty major media partners on the maven stack and the company was rumoured to be cash-flow positive on annual licensing revenue.

on 12 february 2008 yahoo announced the acquisition for around $160 million in cash. that was the same quarter microsoft was making the $44.6 billion takeover bid for yahoo itself, and the same quarter jerry yang was trying to demonstrate that yahoo had a credible video strategy without microsoft. maven became a wholly owned subsidiary, technically continued to serve its existing publisher customers, but no new publisher signed onto the standalone maven platform after the acquisition.

seventeen months later, on 29 june 2009, yahoo told maven's customers that support and development would end. the platform's existing publisher clients had to migrate off, mostly to brightcove or to in-house players built on the open-source jw player. yahoo kept some of the engineers and folded the underlying video pipeline into the yahoo video player and the brightroll-adjacent yahoo video advertising platform. the maven brand itself was retired. it was one of the cleanest acquihire-kill stories of the marissa-mayer-arrives-soon period at yahoo, even though mayer did not arrive until 2012.

~ the record ~

~ the early days ~

the 2005-2008 window was when every big media company suddenly needed a video strategy and almost none of them had engineering teams that could build one in-house. youtube had launched in '05 and was already serving an order of magnitude more video than every traditional broadcaster combined. embedded video on a publisher's own site was the obvious counter-move, but the engineering load of running a video player, an ad server, a content management interface and a cdn integration was too much for a print-media digital team.

maven sold the answer. one platform fee, one white-label player, one ad-insertion api, and your existing brand assets stayed on your domain. the company was led by hilmi ozguc, who had previously been at the meedio digital-video startup, with a technical team that had built the underlying platform on top of windows media services and then flash video. by '07 the press deck was claiming that maven's partners collectively served around three billion video streams a year, which was a respectable share of premium publisher video for the period.

~ the actual end ~

yahoo's $160 million for maven was a lot of money for a company whose annual revenue was probably under $30 million. the rationale yahoo gave at the time was that the maven platform would form the foundation for a yahoo-managed video network across both yahoo's own properties and a federated ad-supported partner network. the integration work to fold maven's platform into yahoo's video infrastructure took a year and a half, by which time the publisher market for white-label video had stopped looking like a growth story.

two things broke the maven thesis at once. youtube launched its branded-channel embed program with revenue share, which made the cheap path for a publisher to embed youtube on its site instead of paying maven. and the open-source jw player became good enough that even small publishers could build their own flash-video player with html5 fallback for almost nothing in licensing. by june 2009 yahoo's product cleanup post-microsoft-bid-collapse identified maven as a standalone business no longer worth keeping outside the yahoo media stack. the 29 june 2009 announcement gave publisher customers a few months of runway. most migrated off by year-end.

~ the legacy ~

the white-label-video-platform-for-publishers model maven pioneered survived as brightcove, which became the canonical entry in the category after yahoo killed maven. brightcove went public in 2012 and is still public in 2026, serving roughly the same role for the same kind of publisher customer that maven served in '07. the larger lesson, that buying a successful b2b platform to fold into a consumer business almost never works as a kill-and-integrate exercise, became part of every later yahoo acquisition postmortem, from flickr through tumblr.

the cambridge office closed in mid-2009. the maven engineering team mostly dispersed into other boston-area video startups, a handful followed the platform to yahoo and stayed through the integration. ozguc himself surfaced a few years later at a content-marketing startup. the foxnews.com video player around 2010 was a transitional brightcove build, with the same general shape as the maven player it replaced. that is roughly the dignity owed to a quiet b2b acquisition. nobody remembers the platform but the player skin lingered for years.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »