Ladies' Home Journal

» see lhj.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the goodbye ~

us women's service monthlies were a shelf category i knew from cover photos and article citations, not from touching the object. by the time i was reading english fluently in the mid-2000s from ankara, ladies' home journal was already sliding out of the meredith rotation. anyway, the 4.6 million circulation number from the eisenhower years was a paragraph in press retrospectives, not a business.

louisa knapp curtis started editing what began as a women-at-home supplement to her husband's tribune and farmer paper in 1883. by 1889 the supplement had spun off as its own monthly. edward bok married into the curtis family and took the editor chair in 1890. under bok the title hit one million subscribers in 1903, the first american magazine to do so.

the magazine sat inside the curtis publishing company from 1891 to 1968. after curtis unwound, ownership passed through downe communications and family media before meredith bought the title in 1986. by then the peak had come and gone. the 6.8 million circulation of 1968 gave way to a steadier three-million-copy base that meredith held into the 2000s.

meredith's decision to end the monthly landed clean. in april 2014 they announced the frequency would drop after 131 years, with the july '14 issue as the last monthly. the title stayed alive as a newsstand-only quarterly for two more years. the final issue came out in 2016 as a single-topic partnership run with grand editorial, then the masthead was retired.

~ the chronicle ~

~ the curtis and edward bok run ~

under edward bok the magazine ran twenty-nine years of editorials that took on cause after cause. bok's campaigns pushed against patent medicines with concealed formulas and against public drinking cups on trains. he ran a serialized advice column under the pen name ruth ashmore, actually written by isabel mallon. sarah tyson rorer took the food-editor chair from 1897 to 1911.

the one-million-subscribers hit in 1903 was covered as a publishing landmark for a decade after. by 1919 bok had stepped down. the title kept running under a series of curtis-era editors and held a peak circulation around 4.6 million in 1955 with roughly eleven million pass-along readers per issue if the estimates were accurate.

~ the meredith era ~

meredith bought ladies' home journal in 1986 from family media inc after a decade of ownership changes and shrinking circulation. the des moines company already ran better homes and gardens and country home. lhj was slotted into the same portfolio as a women's-service monthly, competing with mccall's and hearst's good housekeeping. through the 1990s and 2000s the magazine held its ad base against the same slow print erosion that wore down the whole women's-service category. the "can this marriage be saved?" column, started in 1953, ran continuously through this period as the syndicated identity anchor.

by 2011 the print circulation was 3,267,239. that number was down from the mid-century peak but still big for a monthly holding one category. from 2010 forward the drop was steeper. digital ad spend for the target demographic had already moved into hearst and meredith's own recipe and home websites, the print rate base was pulling less ad revenue each year.

~ the last year of the monthly ~

in april '14 meredith announced the monthly would end with the july issue. the plan was to switch to a quarterly newsstand special-issue format under the ladies' home journal name, with distribution capped and no home-subscription business. staff cuts followed. the magazine kept a small editorial team for the special issues and handled promotional partnerships from meredith's central resources.

the quarterly ran through 2015 and into '16. the last issue was a single-topic partnership run with grand editorial in 2016, at which point meredith retired the masthead. after that the ladies' home journal name persisted only in the archive and in later meredith reference material. no online property inherited the audience, the readership was old enough that the pivot did not carry.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »