DoubleClick

» see doubleclick.net as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the obit ~

doubleclick started in february 1996 in a small new york office, when kevin o'connor and dwight merriman took the ad-serving problem seriously enough to build a product around it. their pitch was called dart, dynamic advertising reporting and targeting, and it was basically a database that decided which banner ad to show to which browser session and then counted the impressions and clicks that came back. by the late 1990s dart was running behind a large share of the display advertising on the commercial web.

this was a real company in a real bubble. really though, doubleclick went public in 1998, the stock did what stocks did in the dot-com years, the crash came, they bought abacus direct in 1999 for the offline consumer database (which turned into a small privacy scandal), they laid off waves of engineers in 2001-2002 and survived. hellman and friedman bought the company private in 2005 for 1.1 billion. three years later, in march 2008, google bought it from hellman and friedman for 3.1 billion. the acquisition took a year of ftc review before closing.

what google actually got was a display ad server that had been running for a decade and had every big publisher already integrated. the doubleclick ad exchange became google's real-time bidding infrastructure. dart for publishers became dfp, which became google ad manager. dart for advertisers turned into campaign manager. anyway, the whole ad-tech stack you see when you open chrome devtools and look at what is loading is largely doubleclick code that google inherited and built on.

i did not touch this side of the internet from inside as a user, but you cannot spend the last twenty years online without meeting doubleclick indirectly. every time your browser blocked doubleclick.net in the network tab, every time an ad-blocker showed a big number of blocked requests, every time your grandmother's local news site loaded slowly because doubleclick's ad call was hanging, that was the same company. for a big part of the 2000s and 2010s, doubleclick was the ad-tech background hum of the whole commercial web.

~ the rap sheet ~

~ the google purchase ~

the 3.1 billion dollar deal in march 2008 was not obvious in the moment. microsoft had just tried to buy yahoo for 45 billion, aol was still a media company, facebook had been running for four years but was not yet a serious ad-tech competitor. google itself was mostly a search-ads company, adsense was the beginning of its display push, and doubleclick was the piece it did not have.

the ftc took a year to approve the deal. anyway, the concern was market concentration in display advertising. the eu approved it in march 2008 with no conditions. by 2011 the doubleclick assets were fully integrated into google's ad-tech stack and generating the majority of google's non-search-ads revenue. anyone who reads about google's antitrust troubles in 2020-2025 is reading about doubleclick indirectly. the ad exchange, the ad server for publishers, the way big publishers are locked into google's stack for both selling and buying ads, all of that infrastructure was bought in 2008 with the doubleclick check.

~ the day the name died ~

google announced the brand consolidation on 27 june 2018. the actual switch happened on 24 july 2018. anyway, doubleclick bid manager became display and video 360. doubleclick search became search ads 360. doubleclick campaign manager became campaign manager 360. doubleclick for publishers became google ad manager. all four sub-brands got renamed on the same day and google marketing platform launched as the umbrella brand for the advertiser side of the products.

the reason given was fragmentation. the doubleclick brand plus the google analytics 360 brand plus the adwords brand plus the adsense brand had turned google's ad-tech pitch into a mess of overlapping names, and enterprise customers were asking for a cleaner story. adwords got renamed to google ads on the same date. doubleclick was the biggest name that disappeared but not the only one. the products all kept running. the invoices changed. the account managers changed. nothing else moved.

~ what got buried ~

a twenty-two-year-old ad-tech company that most people who worked in the industry had a strong opinion about. really though, doubleclick had reputation problems for a long time before google bought it (the abacus direct merger, the third-party cookie tracking, the privacy campaigns of the late 1990s all involved doubleclick). that reputation followed the brand into the google era. by 2018 the doubleclick name had become something google's enterprise customers wanted to distance themselves from and google gave them the rebrand as a gift.

what did not get buried was the code. doubleclick dart was the ancestor of the ad-serving infrastructure that runs behind chrome and safari and every browser that still allows third-party cookies at all. the technical patterns doubleclick pioneered in 1997 (cookie-based cross-site tracking, real-time ad auctions, publisher yield optimization) are what the whole privacy-sandbox debate in 2020-2026 is trying to unwind. the brand is gone. the arguments doubleclick started are still running.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »