ConnectU

» see connectu.com as it lived, on the wayback machine

~ the last words ~

in 2003 i was an undergrad in ankara at a fresh broadband connection (or whatever counted as broadband then). the harvard sophomores who would soon sue mark zuckerberg were a parallel-universe version of the founders story i would not hear about for years. their social network ended up as a 65 million dollar settlement plus a domain that got bought specifically to be turned off. armie hammer played both winklevoss twins in the david fincher film about it. that movie is most of what survives.

the winklevoss twins started talking about harvardconnection with their classmate divya narendra in december 2002. they wanted an inter-college network with profiles plus dating-adjacent matching. they hired sanjay mavinkurve and victor gao to write the code. by november 2003 they brought a younger classmate named zuckerberg onto the team and gave him access to the codebase plus the server. zuckerberg launched thefacebook.com on february 4, 2004 instead, weeks before harvardconnection finally shipped under its new name connectu on may 21 of the same year.

the gap between those two dates is the entire story. by the time connectu was live, thefacebook had a month's head start at harvard plus visible expansion to the other ivy campuses. it had already taken the network effect that connectu had been designing for. connectu existed in production for years afterward but never grew a userbase that mattered. its real product was the lawsuit.

~ the record ~

~ what it actually was ~

connectu's interface was profile, friend list, message inbox, photo upload, college affiliation. the same furniture every early-2000s social network had. the proposed angle was inter-school connection, which was also the angle thefacebook would pursue once it left harvard. the underlying graph thesis was identical. the cofounders later argued that the source code plus the feature concept had been taken directly from their notes during the brief window zuckerberg had access. zuckerberg argued the code was independent and the concept was generic.

that argument never got resolved on the merits. what got resolved was the financial part. connectu's product never reached the threshold where its actual functionality mattered to anyone outside the case.

~ the lawsuit ~

connectu sued thefacebook in 2004. the case ran for four years through state plus federal court, with a counterclaim from facebook about a side project called social butterfly. in february 2008 the parties signed a settlement. the figure was 65 million dollars, mostly in facebook stock at a pre-ipo valuation that turned out to be wildly under the eventual public market price. the settlement also bought the connectu domain and required the site to be shut down. the cofounders kept fighting after that, arguing the stock had been misvalued at signing, which produced years of follow-on litigation that never reopened the original judgment.

the cultural artifact is the 2010 david fincher film. armie hammer plays both winklevoss twins with a tennis-bro intensity that became the popular memory of the case. the actual product, the website connectu.com, gets maybe ten seconds of screen time. the real-life winklevoss twins took the settlement money into early bitcoin purchases through gemini exchange and turned the loss of the social network race into a separate crypto-billionaire arc.

~ the inheritance ~

connectu's inheritance is the question of whether a social network is a thing you can own. the legal theory that lost in 2008 was that an idea expressed in notes can be misappropriated through code access. in practice thefacebook outshipped connectu by months and that gap was the whole game. since then a generation of consumer software lawsuits have tried to litigate the same question of derivative product versus independent invention. most of them have ended the same way, with money paid and the original idea claim left unanswered on the merits.

the domain itself was extinguished as a term of the settlement, which is unusual. most absorbed-and-killed shutdowns leave the brand at least nominally alive somewhere. connectu was specifically purchased to be erased. the only remaining version of the site sits in internet archive snapshots from before february 2008, showing a profile page interface that looks like every other early-stage social network of the period. an unremarkable product whose entire footprint became one lawsuit plus one movie.

@}-->--

              )
             (_)
            .-'-.
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
            |   |
          __|   |__   .-.
       .-'  |   |  `-:   :
      :     `---'     :-'
       `-._       _.-'
           '""""""

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »