Fark

» go to fark.com now (it still works)

~ what it is ~

drew curtis registered fark.com in september 1997, the name being a chat room stand-in for a different four letter word. in 1999 it became a news aggregator. members submit links to strange news with a rewritten headline, curtis and his admins greenlight a handful to the front page, and each one gets a tag: OBVIOUS, DUMBASS, HERO, SCARY, FLORIDA. the first story ever posted was about a fighter pilot mooning someone. the editorial bar has stayed at exactly that altitude, on purpose, for twenty seven years.

around 2002 fark was my glimpse of what americans found funny about their own news. i was reading it from turkey on a dial-up connection, and half the jokes required cultural context i did not have. the FLORIDA tag needed no translation.

~ the headline as art form ~

the submitted headline is the product. the linked article is optional reading. farkers compete to compress a news story into one joke, and the greenlight is the prize. this made fark a headline writing school years before twitter existed, and the FLORIDA tag was cataloguing that state's news output more than a decade before florida man became an account. the photoshop contests, where members doctored an image to a theme, were a formative meme engine of the early 2000s.

~ the business that never grew up ~

totalfark launched in february 2002 at five dollars a month, showing subscribers every submission instead of just the greenlit ones. by 2007 about 2,000 people paid for it. at its january 2008 peak the site drew 52 million monthly page views from 4 million visitors. curtis pays himself a 60,000 dollar salary and puts the rest back into hosting, moderation, and lawyers. he has never sold, never raised money, never pivoted. the 2011 redesign, which the regulars hated with traditional intensity, is roughly the biggest strategic event in site history.

~ what almost killed it ~

digg first, then reddit, doing the same job free at enormous scale. fark's traffic slid from its 2008 peak and never came back, and by every valley logic the site should have folded or sold a decade ago. then there was the patent troll. in 2011 a company called gooseberry natural resources sued fark, along with much larger outlets, over a patent covering the emailing of news releases. curtis refused to pay, fought it, settled for nothing, and gave a ted talk about how. the troll picked the one defendant with no shareholders and infinite stubbornness.

~ why it still matters ~

digg is a grave. stumbleupon is a grave. the aggregators that raised money and chased scale are in the ground, and the one run as a small business by its founder is still greenlighting stories every day in 2026. fark survives because a human picks the links, the humans writing the headlines are funny, and nobody involved ever expected it to be more than that. modest ambitions, it turns out, are load bearing.

« previous  ·  random  ·  next »